Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
articles:process_related_links [2023/02/04 11:51] – [Legacy Flowcharting Symbols (ISO 5807:1985)] rrandallarticles:process_related_links [2023/02/04 12:04] (current) – [Legacy Flowcharting Symbols (ISO 5807:1985)] rrandall
Line 15: Line 15:
  
 ==== Legacy Flowcharting Symbols (ISO 5807:1985) ==== ==== Legacy Flowcharting Symbols (ISO 5807:1985) ====
-While still valid, ISO 5807:1985 (re-affirmed in 2019) is extremely antiquated. Preference should be given to using the "Business Process Model and Notation" (BPMN™) standard for flowcharting your processes.+While still valid, ISO 5807:1985 (re-affirmed in 2019) is extremely antiquated.
  
 [[ :flowchart| Flowcharting Symbology / Conventions]] (Based upon [[https://www.iso.org/standard/11955.html|ISO 5807:1985]]) [[ :flowchart| Flowcharting Symbology / Conventions]] (Based upon [[https://www.iso.org/standard/11955.html|ISO 5807:1985]])
 +
 +Preference should be given to using the OMG "Business Process Model and Notation" (BPMN™) standard for flowcharting your processes.
 +
 +You may wonder that if ISO 5807:1985 is so antiquated, why hasn't ISO adopted BPMN. It has. ISO/IEC 19510:2013 (reaffirmed in 2022) is identical to OMG [[https://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/2.0.1/PDF|BPMN 2.0.1]]... which is a free download. 
 +
 +Then why should you pay for "[[https://www.iso.org/standard/62652.html|ISO/IEC 19510:2013, Information technology — Object Management Group Business Process Model and Notation]]" when the more current OMG BPMN 2.0.2 is a free download from [[https://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN]]? 
 +
 +The only answer I can offer is that ignorance (and resistance to change) can be expensive.
 +