Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
Last revisionBoth sides next revision
articles:pbs_rp_program [2023/02/11 14:35] – rrandallarticles:pbs_rp_program [2023/05/08 18:52] – rrandall
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 Existing AS9100 Registered companies have the option to apply for the "Performance-based Surveillance/Recertification Process" (Described in [[https://www.sae.org/standards/content/as9104/1a/|SAE AS9104/1A]], "Appendix D"). This option allows for a 33% Reduction in the Audit Duration (Maximum of 50%). The criteria for this option are defined in AS9104/1A, "//Table D.1 - Performance-based Surveillance/Recertification Process Requirements//".  Existing AS9100 Registered companies have the option to apply for the "Performance-based Surveillance/Recertification Process" (Described in [[https://www.sae.org/standards/content/as9104/1a/|SAE AS9104/1A]], "Appendix D"). This option allows for a 33% Reduction in the Audit Duration (Maximum of 50%). The criteria for this option are defined in AS9104/1A, "//Table D.1 - Performance-based Surveillance/Recertification Process Requirements//". 
 +
 +<WRAP center round important 80%>
 +As of May 2023 I've learned that ANAB has added requirements that will make compliance with the PBS/RP virtually impossible. And several CBs are already discouraging companies from opting into this program.
 +</WRAP>
  
 ^  Table D.1 - Performance based surveillance/recertification process qualification  ^ ^  Table D.1 - Performance based surveillance/recertification process qualification  ^
Line 22: Line 26:
  
 <WRAP center round info 80%> <WRAP center round info 80%>
-I asked an AS9104/1A committee member "how" the AS9100 Auditors would be determining compliance with ISO 19011. His response was "//Based on our conversations within the writing team, the __intent__ of that standard is what they are going for.//" (sic) However, he also noted that "//the IAQG could always come out with a clear ruling//" (sic) at a later date.+I asked an AS9104/1A committee member "how" the AS9100 Auditors would be determining compliance with ISO 19011. His response was that the word "should" must be read as "shall".
 </WRAP> </WRAP>