Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Last revisionBoth sides next revision
articles:business_continuity_planning [2023/02/04 12:09] – created rrandallarticles:business_continuity_planning [2023/02/04 12:12] – [Business Continuity Planning (BCP)] rrandall
Line 7: Line 7:
  
 While NFPA 1600 has been //influenced// by ISO for many years, it still remains superior to ISO 22301 in many ways (see below). While NFPA 1600 has been //influenced// by ISO for many years, it still remains superior to ISO 22301 in many ways (see below).
- 
-Although a government standard, another very good standard is: \\ 
-NIST Special Publication 800-34 Rev. 1, "//Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems//" \\ 
-[[https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/Legacy/SP/nistspecialpublication800-34r1.pdf]] 
  
 While ISO has produced ISO 22301, "//Societal security — Business continuity management systems — Requirements//", once you dig through all of the required Annex L nonsense.. and the laughable incompetence of the authors, there are only a few gems buried in it. Similarly, ANSI/ASIS ORM.1-2017, "//Security And Resilience In Organizations And Their Supply Chains - Requirements With Guidance//" addresses this topic as well (although the ASIS_SPC.1-2009 version was better in some regards). However, it is too similar to ISO 22301 to be of any real value. While ISO has produced ISO 22301, "//Societal security — Business continuity management systems — Requirements//", once you dig through all of the required Annex L nonsense.. and the laughable incompetence of the authors, there are only a few gems buried in it. Similarly, ANSI/ASIS ORM.1-2017, "//Security And Resilience In Organizations And Their Supply Chains - Requirements With Guidance//" addresses this topic as well (although the ASIS_SPC.1-2009 version was better in some regards). However, it is too similar to ISO 22301 to be of any real value.
Line 17: Line 13:
  
 You may note that NFPA 1600, "//Standard on Continuity, Emergency, and Crisis Management//" (2019 Edition), Annex E, integrates the requirements of NFPA 1600 with ISO Annex SL. This was done to promote integration with existing ISO Management System Standards... and is "//intended to be adopted by the entity at its discretion//". Ultimately, this simply aligns common topics such as document control, corrective action, etc.  You may note that NFPA 1600, "//Standard on Continuity, Emergency, and Crisis Management//" (2019 Edition), Annex E, integrates the requirements of NFPA 1600 with ISO Annex SL. This was done to promote integration with existing ISO Management System Standards... and is "//intended to be adopted by the entity at its discretion//". Ultimately, this simply aligns common topics such as document control, corrective action, etc. 
 +
 +<WRAP center round info 80%>
 +Although developed for Federal Government use, another very good standard is: \\
 +NIST Special Publication 800-34 Rev. 1, "//Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems//" \\
 +[[https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/Legacy/SP/nistspecialpublication800-34r1.pdf]]
 +info box
 +</WRAP>