| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision |
| articles:a_matter_of_risk [2020/02/13 11:24] – [A Matter of "Risk"] rrandall | articles:a_matter_of_risk [2020/02/29 10:44] – [ISO 9000:2015] rrandall |
|---|
| {{ :articles:iso-when_the_world_compromises.png?nolink&800 |}} | {{ :articles:iso-when_the_world_compromises.png?nolink&800 |}} |
| |
| Since the beginning of the 21st century, ISO has been transitioning from a group supported by individual nations; to a central body dictating to those individual nations. It seems that with each new revision to an ISO standard, their true globalist agenda becomes more evident. | Since the beginning of the 21st century, ISO has been transitioning from a group supported by individual nations; to a central body dictating to those individual nations. It seems that with each new revision to an ISO standard, their increasingly globalist agenda becomes more evident. |
| |
| <note important>The [[https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/|Cambridge Dictionary]] defines a "[[https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/globalist|globalist]]" as: \\ //someone who believes that economic and foreign policy should be planned in an international way, rather than according to what is best for one particular country//</note> | <note important>The [[https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/|Cambridge Dictionary]] defines a "[[https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/globalist|globalist]]" as: \\ //someone who believes that economic and foreign policy should be planned in an international way, rather than according to what is best for one particular country//</note> |
| In the above example, there is an implied "//hope//" or "//preference//" for the "positive" risk. | In the above example, there is an implied "//hope//" or "//preference//" for the "positive" risk. |
| |
| The 4-minute video below explains "Positive vs. Negative Risks on Projects": | The 4-minute video below //explains// "Positive vs. Negative Risks on Projects": |
| |
| {{ youtube>pRUF2Uwu62U?large }} | {{ youtube>pRUF2Uwu62U?large }} |
| However, "Note 5" states that the word “risk” is "sometimes" used when there is the //possibility// of only negative consequences (i.e., a "positive" consequence is impossible). In other words, ANY outcome other than the one "expected", will be negative. | However, "Note 5" states that the word “risk” is "sometimes" used when there is the //possibility// of only negative consequences (i.e., a "positive" consequence is impossible). In other words, ANY outcome other than the one "expected", will be negative. |
| |
| <note>ISO 14001:2015, "//Environmental management systems — Requirements with guidance for use//", sec. 3.2.10 contains an identical definition for "risk" EXCEPT that it does not include Note 5 & 6.</note> | <note>ISO 14001:2015, "//Environmental management systems — Requirements with guidance for use//", sec. 3.2.10 contains a definition for "risk" identical to ISO 9000:2015 EXCEPT that it does not include Note 5 & 6.</note> |
| ==== ISO Guide 73:2009 ==== | ==== ISO Guide 73:2009 ==== |
| Now that we understand how ISO 9000:2015 has defined risk, and since it contains several references to ISO Guide 73, "//Risk management — Vocabulary//" (which was reviewed and confirmed in 2016), let's take a look at they are different from one another. | Now that we understand how ISO 9000:2015 has defined risk, and since it contains several references to ISO Guide 73, "//Risk management — Vocabulary//" (which was reviewed and confirmed in 2016), let's take a look at they are different from one another. |
