Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
articles [2019/02/03 15:24] – [Articles] rrandallarticles [2019/03/17 18:38] – [Articles] rrandall
Line 10: Line 10:
 [[:articles:optimizing_calibration_intervals|Optimizing Calibration Intervals]] [[:articles:optimizing_calibration_intervals|Optimizing Calibration Intervals]]
  
-[[:articles:Calipers-advantages_and_disadvantages|Calipers - advantages and disadvantages of the 3 types]]+[[:articles:Calipers-advantages_and_disadvantages|Calipers: Advantages and Disadvantages of the 3 types]] 
 + 
 +[[:articles:triz_application|Continuous Improvement... and TRIZ]] 
 ====== Videos ====== ====== Videos ======
  
Line 18: Line 21:
 {{ :articles:caliper_calibration.mp4 |}} {{ :articles:caliper_calibration.mp4 |}}
  
 +===== Standard Work Audits =====
 +
 +A great video from Patrick Adams (CEO of [[https://findleansolutions.com|PA Consulting Services LLC]]). Patrick is a MBA, Lean Coach, Six Sigma Black Belt from Allendale, Michigan.
 +{{ :articles:patrick_adams-standard_work_audits.mp4 |}}
 +
 +I visited one company where a critical process underwent a Standard Work Audit every hour... performed by a different member of the team working in that process (the auditor role was rotated amongst the team). While ISO 9001 & AS 9100 auditors might question the "impartiality" of the "auditor" performing the Standard Work Audit, none of the "auditors" ever audited their own work. Instead, this approach was, essentially, a "buddy audit" (or "associate audit") approach. This ensured that the entire team was "on the same page" in understanding the process.