Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
articles:context_of_the_organization [2023/02/20 19:36] – [Additional AS 9100:2016 (Rev. D) Requirement] rrandallarticles:context_of_the_organization [2023/03/22 15:45] (current) – [Additional AS 9100:2016 (Rev. D) Requirement] rrandall
Line 84: Line 84:
 |  U.S. Department of State  | Defined in the [[https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/22/chapter-I/subchapter-M|“International Traffic in Arms Regulations” (22 CFR Subchapter M, Parts 120-130)]], when applicable. | |  U.S. Department of State  | Defined in the [[https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/22/chapter-I/subchapter-M|“International Traffic in Arms Regulations” (22 CFR Subchapter M, Parts 120-130)]], when applicable. |
 |  U.S. Department of Defense  | Defined in the “Federal Acquisition Regulations” (FARs) & “Defense Federal Acquisition Regulations” (DFARs), when incorporated into U.S. government solicitations and contracts by reference. | |  U.S. Department of Defense  | Defined in the “Federal Acquisition Regulations” (FARs) & “Defense Federal Acquisition Regulations” (DFARs), when incorporated into U.S. government solicitations and contracts by reference. |
-|  U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS)  | [[https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/15/subtitle-B/chapter-VII/subchapter-C|15 CFR, Subtitle B, Chapter VII, Subchapter C, “Export Administration Regulations”]] (EAR), when applicable.  | +|  U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS)  | [[https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/15/subtitle-B/chapter-VII/subchapter-C|15 CFR, Subtitle B, Chapter VII, Subchapter C, “Export Administration Regulations”]] (EAR), when applicable AND/OR \\ [[https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/other-areas/strategic-industries-and-economic-security-sies/defense-priorities-a-allocations-system-program-dpas|The Defense Priorities and Allocations System (DPAS)]] regulation ([[https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-15/subtitle-B/chapter-VII/subchapter-A/part-700|15 CFR Part 700]]), when applicable |
-|  U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS)  | [[https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/other-areas/strategic-industries-and-economic-security-sies/defense-priorities-a-allocations-system-program-dpas|The Defense Priorities and Allocations System (DPAS)]] regulation (15 CFR Part 700), when applicable  |+
 |  U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT)  | [[https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/49/chapter-I|49 CFR Subtitle B, Chapter I, subchapters A-C, parts 100 thru 185]] & [[https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/49/subtitle-B|49 CFR Subtitle B, Chapters II thru XII]], as applicable. \\ **Note:** [[https://www.iata.org/en/|IATA (International Air Transport Association)]] is an industry trade organization providing information for the international transportation of dangerous goods by air. The [[https://www.iata.org/en/publications/dgr/|IATA “Dangerous Goods Regulations” (DGR)]] is NOT an official regulatory document but may be referenced for guidance.  |  U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT)  | [[https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/49/chapter-I|49 CFR Subtitle B, Chapter I, subchapters A-C, parts 100 thru 185]] & [[https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/49/subtitle-B|49 CFR Subtitle B, Chapters II thru XII]], as applicable. \\ **Note:** [[https://www.iata.org/en/|IATA (International Air Transport Association)]] is an industry trade organization providing information for the international transportation of dangerous goods by air. The [[https://www.iata.org/en/publications/dgr/|IATA “Dangerous Goods Regulations” (DGR)]] is NOT an official regulatory document but may be referenced for guidance. 
 |  Certification Body (CB)  | Defined in the specific CB's "Rules of Registration" |  Certification Body (CB)  | Defined in the specific CB's "Rules of Registration"
 \\ \\
 +Ignoring ISO 9001:2015, Annex A.3, some AS91xx auditors demand the addition of other interested parties. One of the most common is the "owners". Their logic is that the owners communicate their quality-related requirements through the "Quality Policy". While this is much like claiming that wood is an interested party to the tree, it's easier to add "Owners" as an interested party rather than argue the point.