Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
articles:nist_traceability [2019/01/26 14:45]
rrandall [An "unbroken chain of calibrations" to what?]
articles:nist_traceability [2019/01/26 14:47] (current)
rrandall [An "unbroken chain of calibrations" to what?]
Line 41: Line 41:
 a. calibrated or verified, or both, at specified intervals, or prior to use, against measurement standards __traceable to international or national measurement standards; when no such standards exist, the basis used for calibration or verification shall be retained as documented information__;//"​ a. calibrated or verified, or both, at specified intervals, or prior to use, against measurement standards __traceable to international or national measurement standards; when no such standards exist, the basis used for calibration or verification shall be retained as documented information__;//"​
 </​WRAP>​ </​WRAP>​
-Unfortunately,​ the language in ISO 9001:2015 & AS9100:2016 (Rev. D) is extremely antiquated ​(by about 55 years) ​in stating its requirements for "​measurement traceability"​. In contrast, ISO 17025:2017 is much more modern and technically correct in stating:\\+Unfortunately,​ the language in ISO 9001:2015 & AS9100:2016 (Rev. D) is extremely antiquated in stating its requirements for "​measurement traceability"​. In contrast, ISO 17025:2017 is much more modern and technically correct in stating:\\
 <WRAP center round box 80%> <WRAP center round box 80%>
 **ISO 17025:2017, “General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories”** \\ **ISO 17025:2017, “General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories”** \\