Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
articles:nist_traceability [2019/01/26 14:41] – [An "unbroken chain of calibrations" to what?] rrandallarticles:nist_traceability [2019/01/26 14:47] – [An "unbroken chain of calibrations" to what?] rrandall
Line 41: Line 41:
 a. calibrated or verified, or both, at specified intervals, or prior to use, against measurement standards __traceable to international or national measurement standards; when no such standards exist, the basis used for calibration or verification shall be retained as documented information__;//" a. calibrated or verified, or both, at specified intervals, or prior to use, against measurement standards __traceable to international or national measurement standards; when no such standards exist, the basis used for calibration or verification shall be retained as documented information__;//"
 </WRAP> </WRAP>
-Unfortunately, the language in ISO 9001:2015 & AS9100:2016 (Rev. D) is extremely antiquated (by 55 years) in stating its requirements for "measurement traceability". In contrast, ISO 17025:2017 is much more modern and technically correct in stating:\\+Unfortunately, the language in ISO 9001:2015 & AS9100:2016 (Rev. D) is extremely antiquated in stating its requirements for "measurement traceability". In contrast, ISO 17025:2017 is much more modern and technically correct in stating:\\
 <WRAP center round box 80%> <WRAP center round box 80%>
 **ISO 17025:2017, “General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories”** \\ **ISO 17025:2017, “General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories”** \\